Archive

Archive for April, 2010

Balanced Scorecard Implementation Plan – Free Bonus to BSC Training

Balanced Scorecard Implementation Scheme

Balanced Scorecard Implementation Scheme

We have released a free bonus to our BSC Training. In “Balanced Scorecard Implementation Plan” you will learn:

  • How to design Balanced Scorecard implementation plan;
  • What people should be involved into the process of implementation;
  • What are key steps about implementation of Balanced Scorecard;

Get the free bonus right now:

Share

Training and Coaching

What companies need Balanced Scorecard and what mistakes are to be avoided

As Balanced Scorecard is gaining popularity, there appear increasingly more issues and questions related to use and maintenance of this popular business performance measurement tool.  These days, we can see more publications in mass media devoted to Balanced Scorecard, problems associated with this system, most common mistakes, stories of failures and success.

Balanced Scorecard is evolving together with the business environment.  More and more companies occupied in various business and non business spheres choose to use Balanced Scorecard which helps companies reach strategic goals and measure performance.  As said above, Balanced Scorecard is being used by various businesses in various parts of the world.

It needs saying that Balanced Scorecard is becoming increasingly popular in government and nonprofit organizations.  If large companies have one major goal of making more profits, increasing value of the company and competitive advantage in the market, nongovernment organizations have limited funds, and so they need to make sure that the money is spent wisely.

The company strategy should be formulated in financial terms/indicators.  Of course, most businesses have financial goals, and this is normal.  But if the company owners and management do not have strategic vision it will be very difficult to reach these goals even using Balanced Scorecard system.  Companies that view their mission as obtaining a certain position in the market or in the society can make a very effective use of Balanced Scorecard.

You may ask “Why are so many companies interested in Balanced Scorecard?” It seems like there is the dozen (or even more) other alternative business management systems.  As a rule owners and managers of top companies want to use Balanced Scorecard with just one question: “How can I optimize performance of my company to increase its value?” To answer this question, experience of top companies needs to be analyzed.  Such companies as UPS, Mobil, AT&T Canada showed great growth largely due to successful implementation of strategy based management. That’s why managers often view Balanced Scorecard as a tool that can improve performance of the company.  However, one should be careful when analyzing successful experience of different companies, since every company is individual, and thus requires different measures, approaches, response actions, and strategic goals.  Do not forget that this is somebody else’s experience.

It is also important to realize when the company needs implementation of Balanced Scorecard.  There are 4 major signs indicating that the company requires Balanced Scorecard.

  1. The company has both strategy and mission, but for some reason top management is not involved in strategic planning.  About 85% of managers spend less than an hour a week for strategic planning, or have a very vague idea of strategic management.
  2. Company’s personnel does not understand strategic goals of the company and thus fails to participate in implementation of these goals.  Balanced Scorecard, when implemented properly, serves as a great learning tool for employees.  It is very important that every employee understands his contribution to implementation of strategic goals.  It is imperative that everything employees do is aimed at reaching strategic goals.  Discrepancies between operational and strategic management may have negative consequences to the company performance.
  3. Use of Balanced Scorecard system is highly recommended for holding of companies with no common strategic goal.  If every company pursues own goals, or some companies may not even have any, overall performance of the holding may not be satisfactory.  BSC implementation solves the problem of communication between companies belonging to one holding through development of a comprehensive strategic management scheme.
  4. There is no operational control on implementation of strategic goals.  Strategic management is a continuous process which includes setting of the goals, implementation of the goals, control and response actions.  If a company is unable to control implementation of the set goals it would be fair to think that it will never reach them.
Major mistakes in implementation on BSC

Major mistakes in implementation on BSC

Of course, even the most successful companies faced problems when implementing Balanced Scorecard.  Moreover, these mistakes are typical and as a rule do not depend on the country of the company or the market it operates in.  They can be classified as follows:

  1. Balanced Scorecard is implemented in the company that has no clear and comprehensive strategy.  A company with no strategy will never be able to make an effective use of Balanced Scorecard.
  2. A company has a clear strategy but the Balanced Scorecard is implemented without clear budgeting, human resource management and compensation systems. About 60% of companies cannot combine Balanced Scorecard with budgeting systems.  If personnel is not properly motivated, for example with system of bonuses and rewards, Balanced Scorecard is unlikely to bring some positive results.
  3. It often happens that the company implements Balanced Scorecard, but its personnel is not ready or doesn’t want to use BSC in the everyday routine work.  If a management doesn’t need Balanced Scorecard there is no reason to implement it in the first place.  As a rule, if the company management is reluctant to use Balanced Scorecard, implementation of the system fails even before the initial stage.

Balanced Scorecard: future prospects

It seems like Balanced Scorecard is not going to have tough competition in the nearest future. These days, there are many strategic development tools. However, it is only BSC that can combine strategic vision with everyday routine work of the company (operational level).

Of course, the system will further develop and improv to effectively use such modules as investment planning, budgeting, human resource management etc.

Does your company need BSC?

Does your company need BSC?

Share

Articles, Balanced Scorecard Theory

What “balanced” in Balanced Scorecard means – Bonus to Balanced Scorecard Training

We have released a free bonus to our BSC Training. In “What Balanced in Balanced Scorecard means” you will learn:

  • What “Balanced” in Balanced Scorecard is;
  • Balance provided by 4 basic categories;
  • Balance provided by weights;
  • Balanced provided by short and long-term goals;

Get the free bonus right now:

Share

Training and Coaching

Strategics Goals and Strategy Map – Bonus to Balanced Scorecard Training

We have released a free bonus to our BSC Training. In “Strategics Goals and Strategy Map” you will learn:

  • What to do if strategic goals are not clearly defined;
  • How to find out what are strategic goals of your company, business unit or even within single projects;
  • How to analyze goals from the viewpoint of Balanced Scorecard 4 perspectives;

Get the free bonus right now:

Share

Training and Coaching

Download Balanced Scorecard Training Bonuses

Use the form below to download free bonuses for Balanced Scorecard (BSC) training. These bonuses are delivered in as mp3 files packed in .zip archive.

Please, specify your email address below to download Free Balanced Scorecard Training Bonuses:

  • You will have download link immediately;
  • You will have e-mail with some start-up instructions;
  • We can send you some offers about templates and BSC products;

Please, note: if for some reasons you don’t want to have emails from us, but still want to use BSC bonuses, you can just click the button without entering any email.

Share

Training and Coaching

Balanced Scorecard Training Bonuses

Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and KPI templates for free


Balanced Scorecard Templates for FREE. Download now!
Video TutorialBonus Mini-Training: BSC Templates

We have designed some templates for Balanced Scorecard. These templates make it easy to represent ideas about Balanced Scorecard visually. Check below some examples of balanced scorecards’ templates and download the file with templates.

Download Balanced Scorecard Templates

BSC Templates are available as PPT and PDF files:

Download templates for Balanced Scorecard presentation for free.

Inside Balanced Scorecard Templates

Simple Balanced Scorecards Template

Simple Balanced Scorecards Template

Balanced Scorecard Template with initiatives

Balanced Scorecard Template with initiatives

How could Balanced Scorecard templates help your business?

  • The most important: representing data in a visually appealing way makes it easier to convert data to the information;
  • Ready-to-use templates for Balanced Scorecard save your time, you don’t need to hire professional designer – you already have what you need for a quick start;
  • Templates are great way to focus on data mining and information analysis rather than on graphical design;
Share

BSC Templates

Download Balanced Scorecard (BSC) templates for free

Use the form below to download the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) templates for free. These templates are delivered in form of PowerPoint (.ppt and .pptx files) and Adobe Acrobat file (.pdf).

Please, specify your email address below to download Balanced Scorecard (BSC) templates:

  • You will have download link immediately;
  • You will have e-mail with some start-up instructions;
  • We can send you some offers about templates and BSC products;
Share

BSC Templates

Measurment-Based Management History

Balanced scorecard system, no matter how much revolutionary it can be, is not an entirely new concept.  As known, balanced scorecard is used to measure business performance through evaluation of key performance indicators which help company management set realistic strategic goals and work out methods to achieve them.  Until the early 1990s businesses, military and government bodies used measurement based or fact based management which evaluated financial indicators only. And that was the difference between traditional measurement management and balanced scorecard which includes 3 other perspectives besides financial (they are financial, customer, internal processes and learning and growth). Read more on 4 BSC perspectives here.

It should be noted that measurement based management flourished during the industrial revolution/industrial age.  Now the times have changed, thus requiring new approaches.  But measurement-based management is a predecessor of balanced scorecard and consequently it deserves attention.

The history of post industrial management dates back to early 1950s and is largely associated with W. Edwards Deming.  Together with a Japanese manager Genichi Taguchi, Deming worked out a concept of innovation, quality and employee empowerment.  Contrary to prior beliefs, Deming considered personnel as the company’s source of knowledge that generated ideas to improve quality of products/services.

What was special about traditional control in industry? Producers were afraid that customers will be supplied with poor quality products.  So, industrial companies undertook very aggressive actions aimed at inspection, control and testing the quality of products before they are shipped to customers.  But the key problem was that the company management never solved the root of the problem, but was rather fighting its consequences.  Deming underscored that every stage of production process needs to be analyzed.  If it’s possible to eliminate defects at one of the production stages, there will be less rejected production items.  So, in other words Deming offered to include all business processes is into one measurement system with a good feedback mechanism. Moreover, this meant to be a continuous process.

Deming approaches were adopted by the government and the military in the late 1980s in the US.  During that time a Baldrige Award was created.  This was basically a questionnaire for large and small companies.  The company that had the largest score enjoyed the main trophy and handsome advertising opportunities.  In course of time the Baldrige criteria has become an indicator or a guide lying for business success.  It is possible to say that the questionnaire of Baldrige award was something like a balanced scorecard, as the companies that had won the award used the measurement system in which strategic and tactical plans were combined, analyzed and measured.  It doesn’t mean that companies and managers who failed to win the award were doing a bad job. Baldrige criteria rather gave an answer to the question How well do we know how well we do our work?”

Gov’t bodies added measurement-based management to their arsenal.  Every department had to have a strategic plan, set targets and of course was forced to measure performance from time to time. Budgeting of governments bodies directly depends on their performance, as taxpayers want to see progress.

But the problem is that traditional government and industrial organizations always used data of one kind.  We are talking about financial data.  For example, government bodies often subsidized when they operate at a loss.  So, the key goal was to keep this loss at a certain level, while to the contrary, private companies where over-focused on revenue figures.

There is nothing wrong with financial information.  It is objective and more than precise.  But can financial figures tell us everything about well being of a company?  Financial information tells stories about past, but every manager should look to the future.  This is where Balanced Scorecard System came into play with a set of indicators that get a basic idea of what may, can and should happen in future, and what needs to be done to see this future.  Without strategic vision running business is like driving a car with your eyes closed – you never know where you get in the next second.

So, balanced scorecard came as alternative to financial indicators although it includes financial indicators in the general set of KPIs.  Balanced scorecard helps managers measure how much strategies are effective or if they effective anyway.

Transition to Balanced Scorecard was the requirement of time.  With the technology progress it became increasingly difficult to evaluate performance of white collar workers.  Tangible indicators in industry turned into intangible indicators in the modern business.  So, balanced scorecard turned out extremely effective and thus popular in the new economic and social realities of the early 1990s.

Share

Articles, Balanced Scorecard Theory

Measurement Inversion

A while ago, Doug Hubbard has introduced me to the concept of measurement inversion. According to him the more something matters the less we tend to measure it and the less we know about it. Things that really matter are often highly imprecise and thus there is a great opportunity to learn a whole lot more. Whereas, the things that do not really matter can often be easily measurement and as a result have been studied to death.

For example, CEO’s actions can impact the company much more than those of an entry level employee, but there is a lot more effort in tracking that employee’s time than the CEO’s. Businesses tend to focus on tracking and managing costs, while the better predictability of revenue is by far more important.

This applies to just about anything. The topics that really matter, like love, relationships, community, friendship, motivation, ability to learn, caring, customer loyalty and leadership are inherently hard to quantify and can be damaged by the measurement process itself. However, we would gain a lot more insight by spending the time to try to have a better idea of the degrees within each of these variables, rather than trying to insure that the attendance is perfect, number of orders is processed in a particular amount of time, or scrap rate has reached a certain part per million count.

Thus, a large part of an organizational challenge is to stop measuring all the wrong things, either things that do not really matter, or things that do not tend to vary much, or things that can be measured less frequently, or to a lower level of precision and still not affect how we make decisions.

Measurement has to become divorced from precise numbers, after all most things are not very precise at all. Nor do we need the level of perfect precision, or for that matter can afford it.

Introduction of tools such as Monte Carlo simulation and SPC charting in the calculation of the variables that are used as KPI in the business setting is the ticket to having more meaningful data that facilitates better decisions.

Among those KPIs one that is worth at least occasionally considering is the benefit from improvement in decision making as a result of availability of the measurement data for each variable at a level of granularity and accuracy that is  currently available. This may help us fight the measurement inversion.

Oleg Tumarkin, JD, MBA, CSSBB is an Adjunct Professor of Business at Lakeland College and Concordia University of Wisconsin. His firm, FutureWorks, in partnership with Bucket Brigade and AKS-Labs provides business coaching and Balanced Scorecard implementations.  His life’s passion is the development of a universal business measurement and management system that would cause management in to the realm of a repeatable, replicable, yet humane and flexible science.

Share

Balanced Scorecard Theory

Balanced Scorecard Master Group Balanced Scorecard Master Group