Archive

Archive for June, 2010

BSC Designer helps to estimate project progress

I am working on Software and Hardware Application Development and tried BSC Designer for checking out special scenarios for project development and controlling.

After checking the BSC Designer Light version, I downloaded the BSC Designer PRO trial-version because of its additional features.
The graphical interface improves the interactive modeling of business processes. Especially the possibility to manipulate values and to see the results immediately makes BSC Designer a “creative” tool. The software has an excellent functionality for developing strategies, modeling the underlying processes and checking out the consequences of changes under specific conditions.
Applying BSC Designer to project data with known results allows a realistic estimation of the relationships between conditions given for processes in the past and achieved results. Based on such “success patterns” BSC Designer improves the modeling of expected results for future strategies depending on given conditions.

BSC Designer is an easy-to-use tool for planning and prototyping business strategies under respect of context dependent influences. Different scenarios can easily be prototyped by using BSC Designer’s category-indicator structure and its weighting mechanisms. Using BSC Designer as web-based service makes it possible to show all participants of a project the performances of business processes at a glance.

I hope to convince colleagues for using BSC Designer to improve our job by it and to implement the BSC approach in our company.

Dr. Udo Mattusch, Senior Developer at http://www.umanet.de (Cologne, Germany)

Signature text:
I confirm, that bscdesigner.com is permitted to put this information on the bscdesigner.com-web-site.

Dr. Udo Mattusch, Senior Developer at http://www.umanet.de (Cologne, Germany)

Share

Case Studies

Evaluation of HR with Balanced Scorecard

Why care about personnel?

With the a rapid development of IT technologies and the Internet business owners sometimes tend to forget that their businesses are still run by people.  Indeed, it is very easy to start believing that investments and IT solutions can perform magic.  Everything was more or less fine until the recent economic meltdown.  It was the time when most businesses came to understand that intellectual capital is one of the major things that can say the company.  We have witnessed bankruptcy of various companies, including giants like General Motors.  But at the same time, some companies managed to survive, and moreover to gain competitive advantage.  Innovation is a key success factor in the today’s business.  By offering unique products and services a company retains existing customers and attracts new ones.  One has to admit that all innovative ideas come from people, not computers and machines.  Sometimes, the most creative and revolutionary ideas may come from the lowest company level: ordinary clerks, front line managers etc.

This is to say that human resources and intellectual potential is the most valuable capital a company may have.  Even having considerable investments and production facilities, the company may fail just because the personnel is not ready to use the money in an efficient way.  For this reason importance of human resource management has grown over the past decade.

HR and BSC

There is a common misconception that human resource management is about just having a human resource department that hires and fires people, as well as conducts occasional training.  Well, this is not so.  Human resource department, as any business branch or business unit, should be well integrated into the organization structure of the company in terms of strategy, mission and values.  And as any business unit, human resource management should undergo regular evaluation in order to assess HR efficiency of the company and conformity of human resource management with the company strategy.  Such evaluation is extremely important as it often happens that HR goals and measures have nothing to do with the company strategy.  Chairman of HR department may interpret strategic goals of the company in his own way while ordinary employees may have own concepts of company strategy.  This is where Balanced Scorecard comes into play.  BSC can align human resource policy with a strategy of the company, as well as communicate strategic and operational management, thus putting strategy into action.  Balanced Scorecard is not just another business management tool.  It gained tremendous popularity among the most successful companies in the world as it was the first to offer inclusion of non-financial indicators to the system of performance evaluation.

If we are talking about human resource management we cannot fully evaluate HR department with financial indicators only (although financial indicators are very important).  Such things as organization climate, employee satisfaction, loyalty to the company and many others can be hardly represented with financial indicators.  That’s why use of Balanced Scorecard to evaluate HR performance is especially effective.

HR evaluation with Balanced Scorecard: KPIs, categories, explanations

Implementation of Balanced Scorecard to evaluate HR performance starts just like implementation of BSC in any other business area.  First and foremost, HR department should find and employ employees who will be responsible for BSC implementation and maintenance.  One of the most common mistakes in Balanced Scorecard implementation is putting the burden on shoulders of ordinary employees who are not quite aware of what BSC is used for.  Then comes the most important stage – choice of key performance indicators (KPIs).

Much has been written about the art of creating KPIs that must be measurable, informative, clear and understood.  When making a choice of key performance indicators for HR evaluation it is recommended to split them into several categories.  Human resource management is about recruitment, employment, education and retainment of personnel.  So, it would be logical to select key performance indicators based on these categories.

It should be mentioned that some categories and key performance indicators would have higher priority for companies with different structure, position in the market and strategic goals.  For example, it may be cheaper for a retail sales chain to recruit inexperienced employees and then educate them, while IT company will certainly look for experienced professionals who need no education and time to get used to the work.  Do remember that the wrong choice of key performance indicators will result in the wrong evaluation results and failure to reach strategic goals.

Recruitment

Most HR managers use KPIs related to searching for employees, organization of interviews, evaluation of interview results.  In simple words, the company looks for people who might be potentially interested in certain positions, invites these people to interview and then decides whether they meet job requirements.

At a first glance recruitment seems like an easy process.  But in certain business areas finding a competent employee may become a real problem.  Sometimes, companies have to spend serious money to employ the best professionals in a certain business area.  That’s why, human resource department should control recruitment processes and evaluate recruitment efficiency.  Thus, it is recommended to choose proper KPIs to evaluate them with Balanced Scorecard.  There are dozens of key performance indicators related to recruitment efficiency.  We will name the most common and indicative ones.

Average time to recruit. If the company is looking for new employees then it has vacant positions to be filled.  Lack of employees may negatively affect performance of the company.  So, the sooner HR department manages to find competent employees, the better for the company.

Average cost to recruit per position.  In order to shorten recruitment time some HR managers spend too much on advertising and agent’s fees.  As a result, newly employed professional becomes too expensive for the company.  It is very important to control this indicator to keep costs at a reasonable level.  For example, if a new employee needs further education, it wouldn’t be reasonable to spend too much to hire him.

Cycle time from job acceptance until job start.  Very often there is so much paperwork and formalities that having accepted job offer, a person starts working only in a month or so.  The task of HR department is to decrease this cycle time and make it possible for an employee to start working as soon as possible.

New hire retention rate.  It is very important to make newly hired employees stay with the company by creating suitable working conditions and positive organization climate, especially if the company invested in education of such an employee.  This is an excellent indicator to evaluate efficiency of HR department.

Percentage of recommended job applicants.  If people were recommended to work in the company, such company is a good employer which signals about positive reputation of the company in the society which is a great advantage since HR department spends less for advertising and recruitment purposes.

Education and training

Average number of training hours per employee.  This is a universal key performance indicator used by HR managers in various business areas.  Of course, everything should be in moderation and the number of training hours should not exceed the number of working hours.  Besides, it is extremely important to organize effective training campaigns interesting for employees who should understand why the need education and what benefits of this education are.

Average training cost per employee.  Every company should spend money for education of its employees.  However, the growth of training budget will not necessarily result in higher performance.  That’s why average training cost per employee should be strictly controlled and compared to actual training results.

Percentage of HR budget spent on training.  As already said above, different companies have different goals and requirements to personnel.  Sometimes it is really cheaper to hire an inexperienced employee and educate him than to hire an experienced professional.  So this key performance indicator should be evaluated according to company strategy and goals.

Percentage of courses that are web based.  With the development of the Internet online and web-based courses have become very popular.  As a rule, they are cheaper and much more accessible since employees may participate in such courses directly from their work places.

ROI on training.  This is perhaps the most important indicator as any training session aims at improvement of employees’ skills and broadening their knowledge.  It is measured through tests conducted before and after training sessions.

Employees satisfaction with training.  This simple indicator is also measured through tests and surveys conducted after the training.  Employees satisfied with training sessions are more likely to effectively use obtained skills and knowledge in real work then those were not satisfied with training.

Redeployment and retirement

Average staff turnover costs.  It is not a secret that a company spends a certain amount of money to recruit and educate new employees.  If there is a high staff turnover rate the company will spend much money to fill in vacant positions.  That’s why it is important to control every staff turnover costs for any midsize and large company.

Average retirement age and percentage of early retirements.  These to indicators will help optimize work of the company by evaluating retirement, retirement ages and reasons for retirement.

Percentage of employees talking ill health retirement.  If there are many people in the company who retired because of health concerns it may signal about inappropriate working conditions.

Reward and Retainment

Average number of vacation days per employee.  It is very important that all employees in the company have their vacations according to requirements of their job positions.  Employees should be satisfied with the number of vacation days.

Compensation cost as percentage of revenue.  In most businesses employees receive salary and special bonuses in form of percentage from sales or revenue volumes.  The company should know how much it spends for compensation as compared to total revenue or sales volume.  When companies start to save, they usually begin with compensation which causes conflicts between management and employees.

Female-male salary ratio.  In today’s world women have the same rises the men.  That’s why, in order to avoid problems with feminist organizations the company should track female-male salary ratio, especially if men and women working the same conditions.

Talent retention percentage. It is very important to identify the group of most talented employees and track the turnover in the company.  In other words, this is evaluation of how talent is used.

Personal development and discipline

Absence and lateness rate.  This is an excellent indicator that shows personal discipline of employees (except for valid excuses for lateness and absence).

Percentage of employees receiving regular performance review.  If an employee underwent performance review of a year ago it does not mean that he has the same performance level now.  That’s why it is important to regularly evaluate employees.  In such a way, this indicator shows efficiency of HR department.

Percentage of low and high performing employees.  Any human resource department must control efficiency of company personnel by reviewing its performance level.

Summary

Of course, this is not the full list of all indicators relevant for HR evaluation in different business areas.  However, this article might be helpful for those who are considering implementation of balanced scorecard to evaluate HR performance in the company.  One should remember that improvements in the company must always begin in improvement of personnel.  The point is that human resource department does not earn money.  To moreover, it spends company’s money to provide it with personnel capable of solving complex tasks, offering creative ideas and showing high performance.  Those business owners who disregard such indicators as employee loyalty or organization climate soon discover that the company faces problems.  Remember that satisfied and loyal employees have the most satisfied and loyal customers.  Any commercial business aims at earning money, and customers are the source of money.

Evaluation of human resource performance is a good way to start taking the company to new level in order to stand tough competition in the market and gain competitive advantage .  One should never forget that businesses and companies are run by people, and thus human factor is a number one success factor.

Learn more about HR evaluation in various business areas.

Share

Articles, Balanced Scorecard Theory

Stucture data for implementation of Balanced Scorecard

Working in education area I plan to apply BSC Designer to structure the data that I have collected for implementation of the BSC process. The program helps me in sharpening my measurement tools. From the first user experience, the interface looks rather intuitive and is able to allow the user to know his/her way around easily. Also, it does not require complicated installation, unlike some BSC software in the market.

Ivan Lim, Blurmath Tuition Company, Singapore

Share

Case Studies

BSC Designer as a tool of deployment and strategic control

En Wbric-Rpérez,C.A. estamos siempre en la búsqueda de tecnología de punta para ofrecer a nuestro clientes la máxima calidad en sus proyectos.Después de evaluarlo, creemos que el BSC Designer cumple con los requisitos que lo hace una herramienta estupenda de despliegue y control estratégico. Sus principales atributos son su fácil manejo, adaptabilidad a cualquier tipo de negocio. Lo usamos en negocios de alimentación, medios de comunicación y educativos.


Wilfredo Briceño
Director Consultor

Wbric-Rpérez, C.A. Consultores en Control de Gestión y Costos
WWW.WBRICRPEREZ.COM

In Wbric-Rpérez, C.A. we are always in the search of the most efficient technology to offer ours clients the maximum quality for their projects. After evaluating BSC Designer, we believe that it expires with the requisites that it is done by a marvelous tool of deployment and strategic control. The tool’s principal attributes are its easy handling and adaptability to any type of business. We use it in business of feeding, mass media and education.

Translated by BSC Designer staff.


Wilfredo Briceño
Director Consultor

Wbric-Rpérez, C.A. Consultores en Control de Gestión y Costos
WWW.WBRICRPEREZ.COM

Share

Case Studies

Easy and rapid desing of Balanced Scorecard

Specialist from Business Intelligence and Performance Management Consulting in banking and public sectors – Sylvie Landreau, expert in Performance Management Consulting, manager at CSC France since 2004 skilled in Business Intelligence and ITIL V3 certificated:

I do appreciate to find at last this product on the market that helps me to design in a easy and rapid manner some BSC for client. The balanced scorecard tree and the strategy map are designed very quickly, The product is able to merge several indicators under categories and to developp a multi-level BSC.

Targets, weights and stop lights are flexible and the predefined representations are very expressive for my clients. At the end, the reports are automated and the import/export functions give me a lot of way to proceed.

I do particularly like the export to html that gives me the opportunity to publish reports on intranet sites. BSC designer is a simple and powerful tool that responds exactly to my demand.

BSC Designer helps me to design some prototypes for client even if i have developed my own system for BSC and reports over Excel

Share

Case Studies

Risk Indicators in BSC Designer

Risk Diagram in BSC Designer PRO

Risk Diagram in BSC Designer PRO

The Risk Chart is designed specifically for risk indicators.  It shows the impact and the probability of the risk.  And again, the colors in the background match the color scheme you chose for your stop lights.

The latest version of BSC Designer PRO supports risk indicators. KRI (Key Risk Indicators) are used during the process of risk estimation.

BSC Designer allows to:

  • Add risk indicators to the scorecard (in Standard and PRO editions)
  • Generate key risk indicators report (in Standard and PRO editions)
  • Display the risk diagram for indicators (in PRO edition only)
Share

KRI, Official

IIS measures project performance relative to the overall strategic plan with BSC Designer

Balanced Scorecard Customer:

Informatix Industry Services (IIS) is an IT Consulting Company providing quality products in software application technology. We are committed in delivering products and service that meet customer’s needs. We have embarked on an exercise of quality improvements strategy by implementing ISO 9001:2008 Quality Management System standard. IIS recruits highly skilled, experienced professionals with a wide range of technology platforms and knowledge of best practices

Application of BSC Designer:

  • Measure project performance relative to the overall strategic plan.

Opinion about BSC Designer:

BSC Designer is simple and easy to use and provides an invaluable overarching view of the performance levels at any point in time. It gives management a snapshot of the organisation’s performance in pursuit of the strategic goals thereby allowing management to make informed decisions regarding corrective, mitigation, or evasive actions.

Share

Case Studies

The art of creating key performance indicators

How to identify effective indicators?  This is one of the most frequently asked questions in regard to Balanced Scorecard.  The answer to this question is extremely important because indicators predetermine the way employees would perform tasks they have been assigned.  There is a saying “something that can be measured can be done.” Well, this is absolutely true if we are talking about Balanced Scorecard system.  Performance indicators focus attention of employees on those tasks and processes which top management considers the most important to succeed in a particular business area.  They look like leverages used by top managers to change direction and development paths of an organization.  It is possible to say that key performance indicators are the most powerful instruments to introduce changes in a company and lead it in a new direction.

This is the reason why top managers have to be very careful and respectful towards indicators.  Effectively indicators can stimulate unprecedented positive changes or plunge the company into absolute chaos. If indicators do not correctly transform strategy and goals of the company into certain everyday operations, the company would stumble all the time.  Employees will pursue different objectives, conflict with each other, everyone will be tired and disappointed since enormous efforts will give no results.  In other words, the company will work with diligence but no visible results.

Suboptimized processes

For example, if the cargo transportation company measures efficiency with percentage of timely deliveries, this may result in a sharp increase of shipping costs, because this indicator does not prevent logistic manager from sending half empty trucks to timely deliver cargos.  To keep these costs at a reasonable level the company should introduce another indicator – percentage of unused load capacity in the trucks.  The new combination of indicators would give logistics managers freedom to negotiate with potential and existing customers to change delivery time table for the benefit of both logistics company and a customer.

There is another vivid example – customer support service/information helpdesk.  Customer support service may pay bonuses to employees who are serving the largest amount of customers per hour, or those who manage to solve the maximum amount of customer problems.  It is clear that employees who receive bonuses for the largest amount of served customers are unlikely to spend their time to understand customers’ problems and provide them with the best solution, especially in case of a complicated problem.  In such a situation, some call centers create special groups to handle complicated problems. In such a case, efficiency of employees is measured by how effectively they solve customer problems but not how many customers they manage to serve during an hour.

The above examples prove that choice of key performance indicators is a critical success factor for any Balanced Scorecard. BSC itself encourages company top management to introduce leading indicators instead of lagging ones (financial).  However, it is very important to develop the right key performance indicators for operation and tactical environment of the company.

The art of creating KPIs

Development of key performance indicators is rather art than science.  The team in charge of developing KPIs may need months to collect information on customer demands, standardization of definitions and rules, setting priorities for KPIs and development of a feedback system.  In other words, it may follow all rules and norms for development of KPIs.  However, it gives no guarantees for success.  The team may fall victim of “analytical paralysis” because of their perfectionism.  In reality, the development team should do 80% of work, while the rest 20% of indicators will be added during the initial stages of implementation process.  The real work will show how indicators influence the work of employees.

Interpretation of KPIs and their types

Indicators used in Balanced Scorecard are usually called key performance indicators because they make it possible to quantitatively evaluate how well organization is fulfilling operational, tactical and strategic tasks.  There are two types of key performance indicators: leading and lagging.  Leading indicators evaluate actions influencing future results of the work, while lagging indicators (like most of financial indicators) make it possible to measure results of past work.

Leading indicators are powerful instruments in the Balanced Scorecard.  At the same time, it can be very difficult to locate them.  They provide measurement with key business value factors and make it possible to forecast future results.  Leading indicators quantitatively evaluate current state of a certain parameter (for example, number of contacts with customers per day) or its future value (for example, expected number of contacts with customers in two weeks). At that, the latter option is more effective as it gives sellers and their manager more time to influence results.

Lagging indicators are easy to identify, but to find leading indicators one should possess imagination and persistence.  It is necessary to go backwards in search for the most important factor, based on results obtained from evaluation of lagging indicator.  Since any lagging indicator (i.e. obtained results) includes many factors, it is necessary to find one or two factors that have the most influence on the results.  Here is the list of sample leading indicators and results (lagging indicators).

Leading (first column) and Lagging Indicators

Leading (first column) and Lagging Indicators

The basic idea about leading and lagging indicators is that lagging indicators without leading indicators will tell you nothing about how results will be obtained.  You will also have no alerts and warnings about current problems or success on your way to strategic goals of the company.

At the same time leading indicators without lagging indicators will make it possible for you to concentrate only on the short-term performance.  Leading indicators will help you take preventive actions to improve performance and achieve strategic goals.

Naturally, managers would want to have both leading and lagging indicators in each BSC perspective.  This is how it is possible to balance them and focus both on the past and future events.  Evaluation of leading and lagging indicators is quite a tricky thing.  For example you can measure such indicators as customer satisfaction or complaints from customers as lagging indicators since they are based on past data.  At the same time you can measure such indicators as timely delivery or errors rate which can serve as leading indicators, since timely delivery and no errors in serving customers improve customer loyalty, and such a customer will be buying more from the company in future. Sometimes lagging indicators can alert business owners and managers, but it can be too late.  For example, if error rate is more than 25%, it means that you’re losing customers.

There is a concept that leading indicators are to be used mostly for measuring activity (at process level), while in order to evaluate aggregated effects and results lagging indicators are used.

Summary

Here is the least of characteristics for the “right” key performance indicators:

  • The right orientation.  Key performance indicators should be always integrated into a corporate system of strategy and objectives
  • Individual/targeted responsibility.  Every key performance indicator is assigned to an individual employee or a group of employees responsible for relevant results.
  • Forecast capabilities.  Key performance indicators quantitatively measure factors influencing business cost.  That’s why they are leading indicators outlining desired future results.
  • KPIs encourage to act.  The values of key performance indicators are calculated based on actual data, and thus they make it possible to interfere into processes to improve work results.
  • Low number.  Of key performance indicators should focus attention and efforts of employees and managers on several high priority tasks without wasting time for secondary issues.
  • Easy to understand.  Key performance indicators should be easy to understand for ordinary employees and top management.  In other words, they should not be based on complex coefficients so that employees know how to influence value of a certain indicator.
  • KPIs are balanced and interrelated.  Key performance indicators should be well balanced and support each other (be conflict free).
  • Actuality.  Key performance indicators are to be updated from time to time so that employees and top managers can interfere to correct future results.
  • Accuracy.  Key performance indicators are to provide top management and employees with the most accurate values.  However, it needs saying that it is impossible to create 100% accurate key performance indicator.  Sometimes results are affected by irrational factors which no IT system or human being can forecast.  For example, employee satisfaction is measured through questionnaires and surveys.  But not all employees are honest in their answers.
  • Relevance.  Every key performance indicator has its life cycle.  At first, when indicator is introduced it stimulates and motivates employees.  But in course of time its effect becomes weaker, and thus it needs to be “refreshed”, reviewed or even abolished.

To sum it up, it needs saying that there are no universal rules for creation of key performance indicators and implementation of Balanced Scorecard in general.  Every business is individual.  Thus, suggestions as to BSC implementation can be fairly different.  At the same time, the above tips and information may certainly help aspiring strategic managers to successfully implement Balanced Scorecard without making fatal and the most typical mistakes.

Share

Articles, Balanced Scorecard Theory

BSC implementation stages. Case studies

Strategy of a company, establishment of goals and tasks is a privilege and responsibility of top management, while implementation of strategy is performed by ordinary employees in departments and business units of a company.  Lack of feedback and sharing of information between top management and employees is typical for many businesses. This is explained by information overload of top management which makes it impossible to adequately assess information, and as a result to implement strategic goals by the personnel.

On the other hand, lack of employees‘ strategic goals and proper motivation system leads to the situation when those who implement goals do not coordinate their actions with those who set strategic goals.  Such disorientation often results in utilization of company resources to perform secondary tasks.  This is a typical problem for industrial enterprises with complex structure both in Europe and in U.S.

Company strategy is not self sufficient.  Top management aims at implementation of strategic goals through assigning of tasks to employees and control over their fulfillment.  Relationship chain during strategy implementation consists of two elements:

  • Vertical “top management – personnel.” At this stage top management identifies tasks, makes personnel familiar with them, and controls fulfillment through reports.  If necessary, tasks may be slightly amended.
  • Vertical “personnel – top management.” The personnel receives tasks, undertakes actions to fulfill them and informs top management on fulfillment results.  The next stage implies feedback from top management.

Weak points in this chain are information channels between top management and personnel.  If they do not function properly then decisions may be based on incomplete or distorted information.  Many managers think that having received as much information as possible they protect themselves from making wrong decisions.  But much information does not mean better information.

New management tools

Company management needs the tool that would make it possible to base decision-making process on reliable, complete and adequate information.  Balanced Scorecard system is such a tool that includes financial and nonfinancial indicators, showing progress (or maybe regress) towards implementation of strategic goals.

Efficiency evaluation is exactly the kind of instrument that finds out whether or not operational management complies with company strategic goals (like gaining new market shares, increasing company value etc).  It needs mentioning that Balanced Scorecard is just a tool that facilitates the process of strategic decision making, but it is not a universal treatment for all business problems.  Balanced Scorecard helps identify facts and problem areas but it doesn’t provide managers with ready to use decisions.

Why are we talking about efficiency based management?  Increasing production and improving quality of products is not enough to gain competitive advantage in the modern markets. That’s why an increasing number of companies use progressive methods of corporate governance.  These methods allow to timely react to changes in the market.

The goal of Balanced Scorecard system is to put strategy into action through development and measurement of a complex set of key performance indicators which lays down foundation to form company strategy.

Excessive focus on indicators belonging to one category/group may negatively influence the end result.  That is why Balanced Scorecard System includes four perspectives:

  • Financial
  • Customer
  • Internal processes
  • Learning and growth

Implementation of Balanced Scorecard at the enterprise is performed in 5 stages.  The succession of stages is very important since any changes may have a negative impact on BSC effectiveness.

Stage one.  Strategy development

A clear and comprehensive strategy outlines basic steps to be taken to implement desired goals and results.  Company strategy should be divided into certain strategic initiatives which will identify tasks for certain departments, subdivisions, business units or even individual employees.  Coordination between departments and identification of strategic priorities are key elements of the first stage.

Stage two.  Identification of key success factors

The second stage outlines key success factors, i.e. those characteristics of company managerial and economic activity that are vital to implementation of the strategy.

Stage three.  Identification of key performance indicators

It is imperative to focus on most important indicators.  Their number should be limited otherwise Balanced Scorecard will be too complex.  Besides, KPIs should motivate employees.  These are major requirements for key performance indicators:

  • Limited number
  • Unity for the entire organization
  • Measurability
  • Direct ties to key success factors
  • KPIs should be controlled
  • Motivation for employees

Of course, the choice and the nature of key performance indicators depends on business area of the company and its organization structure.  Let’s view to case studies to illustrate the above said.

Case study number one.  Oil producing company

Structural division: well repair shop

Increase of oil extraction volumes is a strategic goal for oil producing company.  This increase is represented by growth of oil extraction volumes and decrease of losses during oil extraction which lowers oil price. That’s why, key performance indicators for well repair shop are set taking into account both company strategic goals and specific nature of this production unit.  During repair process the well is suspended, and consequently downtime results losses (amount of oil which could be extracted during the downtime period).  Production efficiency of underground reparing is represented by debit increase per well (in tons).

KPIs for well repair shop would have the following structure:

  • Total downtime of wells (identifies losses related to lost opportunities)
  • Average time for repairing (actual-planed)
  • Unit cost for each extra ton of oil (actual-planned)
  • Number of repair campaigns (actual-planned)
  • Average repair costs for one well (actual-planned)

This structure of key performance indicators includes bonus system for employees which motivates them to decrease downtime and repair time through more effective planning and execution of works and improvement in quality of works.  The company evaluates not only the number of repaired wells but also the result – debit increase.  These key performance indicators are coordinated with strategic goals of the company – increase of oil production.  Moreover, these indicators are controlled by well repair shop, which means it can affect them.

Case study number two.  Engineering plant

Organization department: supply and logistics service

The strategic goals for this department are cost decrease of products and shortening of production cycle.  Supply in logistics department has key performance indicators that represent specific nature of the company in general, as well as certain department in particular.  The department is responsible for provision of continuous production process with the component parts and their sufficient stock at the storage facilities.  Failure to supply production process with component parts results in production downtime.  At the same time, stock increase at storage facilities leads to use of additional funds.

The following key performance indicators can be applied to evaluate efficiency of this department:

  • Average time from placing the order to receipt of component parts (planned-actual, in days)
  • Average production downtime caused by logistics failure (in hours)
  • Number of days in the materials turnover cycle (planned-actual)
  • The ratio of stock cost to production volume (planned-actual)

This structure of key performance indicators makes it possible to track efficiency planning of production needs in materials and component parts, as well as avoid overstocking.

Stage four.  Development and evaluation of Balanced Scorecard

At this stage that general system of financial and nonfinancial indicators is being developed.  The combination of key performance indicators, their information value and sufficiency will influence decision-making.

Stage five.  Choice of technical solutions to implement Balanced Scorecard

At this stage the source of information is chosen.  At that, such information choice should be relevant for accurate evaluation of KPIs.  The information should be obtained in a timely manner.

As in any change of management system, implementation of Balanced Scorecard faces obstacles and even certain opposition.  There are several reasons for that.  Firstly, a company or an enterprise may be unready to implement BSC.  This especially concerns enterprises affected by severe crisis, since top management of such companies focuses on fulfilling short-term tasks, but not strategy development.  Secondly, implementation of BSC implies transparent management system and “old school” managers may view this as pressure and total controlThirdly, this is lack of effective IT and information systems.  Fourthly, this is irregular use of Balanced Scorecard.  If BSC is used on occasion its effect will equal zero.  Finally, it is important to remember that Balanced Scorecard does not substitute strategy and system of managerial reports.

Summary

Taking into account the above said, factors for successful BC implementation go as follows:

  • Prior strategy development which is a key success factor. BSE is just a managerial tool
  • Identification of company goals taking into account relation of goal implementation with company value
  • Effective and reliable information system which serves as a source of information and a basis for efficiency evaluation of key performance indicators
  • Support from top management, change of corporate management style, motivation of ordinary personnel.  Without a proper bonus and compensation system it will be difficult to persuade ordinary managers to effectively use Balanced Scorecard.  Key performance indicators evaluation is also about performance evaluation of individual employee.
  • Continuous use of the system, inclusion of BSC to the toolbox of top management

When properly used, BSC improves performance of a company, since every employee understands how his performance affects implementation of company strategic goals.  With Balanced Scorecard top managers can measure performance efficiency of every department, and thus can influence implementation of strategic goals.

In the end, it needs mentioning that successful use of BSC depends on understanding of this tool, its nature, limitations and goals.  Balanced Scorecard is indeed a very effective strategic management tool.  But it is not easy to implement and maintain BSC not because of its complex structure but because of the wrong attitude of top management towards Balanced Scorecard.

The above case studies prove that there is no universal solution.  Balanced Scorecard is individually implemented but every enterprise, and top management should take into account specific nature of a company, current problems, competition in the markets, education level of personnel and a number of other factors to effectively identify most important indicators.  Of course, there are set of key performance indicators characteristic for certain business areas.  But as said above, a thorough research and analysis needs to be performed before making the final decision to implement Balanced Scorecard.

Share

Articles, Case Studies

Measuring Management

There is no doubt that the organizations cannot be any more successful than their management. So, you would think we would have the management performance and forecasting down to a science. Yet, with a few notable exceptions, most of us cannot tell good management from bad one to save our lives. Most of the market invests in stocks with little consideration to the quality of the management team or at most by looking at a very indirect indicators of that quality. It is not uncommon for someone to perform relatively well by just guessing stocks, with no research whatsoever. That tells me that the current financial market is a fairly poor judge of the management quality even without looking at examples of Tyco, Enron and Worldcom.

The impirical studies of management quality are few and most take business as a basic unit, whereas there is extensive evidence that a small business unit (under 150 people) tends to be a much more important indicator of the quality of management team. Perhaps more importantly, only on such a granular level, the variation due to special cercumstances can be properly accounted for and analysed.

It is clear that if we can build a better management team, we can outperform competition, provide a better investment opportunity and achieve more, so how do we get there?

We have already talked about the individual traits of awareness, imagination, empathy and logic that are necessary for management success. We have also talked about the team variable of cohesiveness. We even talked about the past business performance as being a lagging indicator of management quality and having some predictive function if the management is stagnating ( there is no turnover and nobody is learning anything). There are a number of other factors, such as learning and growth, emotional well being, strength of the convictions, prior experiences, personal priorities that certainly impact the team performance.

Finally, there are techniques and tricks, approaches that can be used to leverage the management skill set. Practitioners of Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ) often use example of a modern day eight grader who is transported to 15th century. Even though today he may be an average kid, in that time period he would appear shear genius because of what he knows and could easily do. Thus good technique raises everyone, no matter how mediocre to a level that is a lot higher than what was available without it.  It is so with management: Balanced Scorecard, Theory of Inventive Problem Solving, Lean, Six Sigma, Primal Leadership and many other techniques can raise the quality of leadership substantially.

But we run in to the fundamental problem: if we don’t know what it means to be a quality leader, how will we know if the quality of management is increasing and what is the ROI on that investment? Thus we are back to the measurement challenge.

In a sense, even a crude measurement will give us a substantial improvement over the current state of uncertainty since we have established that we cannot accurately tell a good manager from a bad one, often substituting popularity, or personal charisma for  some indicator of management ability or falling back to relying on the past track record. So, over the next few weeks we will explore alternative ways of approximating the measure of management ability.

Oleg Tumarkin, Juris Doctor, Master of Business Administration, Certified Six Sigma Black Belt is an Adjunct Professor of Business at Lakeland College and Concordia University of Wisconsin. His firm, FutureWorks, in partnership with Bucket Brigade and AKS-Labs provides business coaching and Balanced Scorecard implementations.  His life’s passion is the development of a universal business measurement and management system that would cause management in to the realm of a repeatable, replicable, yet humane and flexible science.

Share

Balanced Scorecard Theory